
Veronica Roth has an extremely relaxed writing style. Her choice of vocabulary is average, her action words are predictable, and her characters all share the same expressions. The description of "she scowled" and she "purse her lips" is repeated a good million times it feels like. Not necessarily saying that's a bad thing. When desiring a quick read, Divergent is nearly perfect. After finding out that Roth was still in college while writing these books, it makes a lot more sense, considering her writing reflects her age. Divergent feels like a watered down The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins, except with a lot more touchy romance. You have the independent, strong female character who knows way more about surviving than any other human being (Tris vs. Katniss), and the stand-off male character who conceals his feelings well (Four vs. Gale). If the two books were placed in front of me, The Hunger Games would be my choice within a split second. Why? The writing

Putting Roth's age and inexperience into consideration, Divergent is an impressive novel. I would love to be able to say that was my first book published. In other words, Roth has something to be proud of. It deserves a 4.2 star rating out of 5. What caused the loss of the 1.8 stars? Undeniably, the lack of creative and enticing writing. Yes, it may seem as if that point is being beat like a dead horse, but it's a huge factor. It's a book, so therefore the writing talent is actually quite important. But overall, the Divergent trilogy is completely worth the read and your time.